|
The Takings Issue -
Resolved
As is observable then, once the police
power and the power of eminent domain are properly related, through the
theory of rights, the problem of regulatory takings is largely solved.
Since no one has a right to use his property in ways that harm or violate
the rights of his neighbors or the public, government may exercise its
police power to prohibit such uses through regulation and owners are
entitled to no compensation because those uses were wrong to begin with.
By contrast, if government wants not simply to prohibit harms, but to
provide the public with public goods, and those goods can be provided only
by prohibiting property owners from doing what they would otherwise have a
perfect right to do, then regulations prohibiting such activities must be
enacted not under the police power but under the power of eminent domain,
for they take the legitimate property of the owners, the uses those owners
would otherwise have every right to make of their property.
Protecting property rights, then, is not
only perfectly consistent with protecting the environment but is required
if we are going to protect the environment. After all, the prohibition of
harmful uses, uses that violate the property rights of others, is the very
essence of environmental protection. When property owners have their
activities restricted in a genuine effort to protect the environment, they
have no ground for complaining and no ground for asking to be compensated
for not doing what they have no right to do to begin with.
There are questions, to be sure, about
whether many such efforts at environmental protection are indeed genuine.
Too often, in fact, the environmental zealots who frequently occupy our
regulatory agencies, are utterly oblivious to costs and benefits when they
draw the line where one manâ€â„¢s right to the active use of his property
ends and another man's right to the quiet enjoyment of his begins. Still,
the principle of the matter is perfectly clear: property owners have no
right to use their property in ways that violate the rights of other
property owners.
|